Evidence before publication
Material factual claims need reviewed supporting sources. Prefer primary documentation, original research and accountable public institutions. Retain source URLs, publication dates where available, access dates and the claim each source supports. A link alone is not verification.
What we publish
Original frameworks, technical architecture, evidence-led analysis and transparent research methods. Opinion is identified through its framing. Conceptual models are not presented as validated benchmarks. A proposed study is not a report of findings.
What we do not invent
Statistics, quotations, respondents, field experience, customers, adoption, testimonials and press coverage. Named organizations and case material require attribution permission. Missing evidence can mean no publication.
Authorship and assisted workflows
All original articles are by Balaji Krishnan. Research and drafting may use automated assistance. The editorial process retains sources and verification records; assistance does not establish factual validity. Review is the default for new automated drafts.
Updates and corrections
Correct material errors promptly and explain the change on the affected page. Preserve first-publication dates and update the modified date. Framework changes receive version history entries; changes to the model's meaning require a new version. Do not silently replace an empirical result or erase a substantive correction.
Distribution
LinkedIn adaptations must add standalone value, remain faithful to the source and avoid invented anecdotes, clickbait and unsupported claims. No post is required merely because a daily job ran.
Reporting a concern
Use the contact information on the about page and provide the page URL and supporting evidence. Reports are assessed on their substance.